Darrell Moore
I used the ARI agent as a user on the Team plan, and it seemed to run correctly, but at the end of the workflow, it did not create a PDF. This is the first time this has happened.
An additional concern I have with this ARI agent generation is that it only considered 178 sources and chose to use 152 of them--I thought it would have considered more. I normally see 300+ sources on other ARI agent generations.
The entire workflow (sources, depth of output, no PDF) makes this feel more like a Compute or Research agent generation compared to an ARI generation.
Can you please look further into this?
You can see more at the link below:
https://you.com/search?q=I+am+having+difficulty+choosing+between+continuing+with+Notion.so+vs+Obsidian.md.+%0A-+AI+usage+and...&cid=c1_98ab535a-bbc2-4725-9a66-2603e021c573
Original ARI Query for Recreation Purposes:
``` md
I am having difficulty choosing between continuing with Notion.so vs Obsidian.md.
  • AI usage and integration are among my biggest deciding factors. I'm aware that Notion has direct AI integration that I pay $10/month for, and I know that Obsidian has plugins for AI where you can manage costs via an API Key from a provider.
  • I'm fine paying for Obsidian Sync, so synchronization is not a big concern.
  • Cost for either solutions is not an issue.
  • I want to find the best solution for me.
  • AI integration
- Ability to search over notes (specified time ranges or keywords)
- Ability to write into new notes.
- Ability to edit notes, create summaries, rewrite sections or entire notes, etc.
  • Supports images, tables, and other objects.
  • Mobile (iOS, iPadOS, macOS) needs good support.
Include any other features or tools that one tool might have or do better than the other. A feature comparison table would be nice to have. Including deciding factors at the end of the report would also be extremely helpful.
```