I used the ARI agent as a user on the Team plan, and it seemed to run correctly, but at the end of the workflow, it did not create a PDF. This is the first time this has happened. An additional concern I have with this ARI agent generation is that it only considered 178 sources and chose to use 152 of them--I thought it would have considered more. I normally see 300+ sources on other ARI agent generations. The entire workflow (sources, depth of output, no PDF) makes this feel more like a Compute or Research agent generation compared to an ARI generation. Can you please look further into this? You can see more at the link below: https://you.com/search?q=I+am+having+difficulty+choosing+between+continuing+with+Notion.so+vs+Obsidian.md.+%0A-+AI+usage+and...&cid=c1_98ab535a-bbc2-4725-9a66-2603e021c573 Original ARI Query for Recreation Purposes: ``` md I am having difficulty choosing between continuing with Notion.so vs Obsidian.md . AI usage and integration are among my biggest deciding factors. I'm aware that Notion has direct AI integration that I pay $10/month for, and I know that Obsidian has plugins for AI where you can manage costs via an API Key from a provider. I'm fine paying for Obsidian Sync, so synchronization is not a big concern. Cost for either solutions is not an issue. I want to find the best solution for me. AI integration - Ability to search over notes (specified time ranges or keywords) - Ability to write into new notes. - Ability to edit notes, create summaries, rewrite sections or entire notes, etc. Supports images, tables, and other objects. Mobile (iOS, iPadOS, macOS) needs good support. Include any other features or tools that one tool might have or do better than the other. A feature comparison table would be nice to have. Including deciding factors at the end of the report would also be extremely helpful. ```
