Suggest New Features 💡

Porque com a ajuda da Inteligência Artificiais podemos melhorar tudo além de precaver acidentes e muito mais ,etc .

Allowing agents to interact with external tools hosted on a user-provided server via an OpenAPI definition would significantly enhance their flexibility and power. Users could register an external tool server by providing the URL to its OpenAPI specification document. You search would parse this specification to understand the available API endpoints (tools), their required parameters, and expected responses. The AI agent could then intelligently choose when to call these external tools during its task execution, similar to how it might use built-in tools. Benefits: This feature would be incredibly beneficial for users and teams needing to integrate AI agents deeply into their existing infrastructure and workflows, like how open webui or similar platforms do (agentspace, microsoft 365 copilot, etc) P.S: Now the standard is SSE or HTTPS MCP remote servers

I propose that You.com include, within the Pro plan, a paid add-on to activate Zero Data Retention (ZDR) and No Model Training (NMT) without requiring the $200/month Enterprise plan. Currently, You.com cannot be used by lawyers, academics, doctors, or corporate employees under the Pro plan because it lacks privacy guarantees. Many users don’t need the full Enterprise benefits (like ARI or an expanded context window); they simply want to keep their data out of training and storage. Offering ZDR and NMT as an add-on to Pro would: Increase Pro subscriptions. Allow privacy-sensitive professionals to use the platform without violating regulations or confidentiality.

Hello You.com team, I’d like to request a new capability for You.com Agents: dynamic file sources that stay up to date without having to delete and re-upload files. Current challenge: When I attach files (including from Google Drive or OneDrive), they are ingested as static copies (often PDFs). Any edits made later in the original document are not reflected in the agent, which forces me to remove and re-upload the file to keep the agent current. Proposed enhancement: Allow agents to link to cloud documents (e.g., Google Docs) and, on each use or at a configurable interval, check for relevant updates and refresh the ingested content automatically. A “Refresh” button and/or an automatic sync schedule (e.g., on run, hourly, daily) would be ideal. Webhook or event-based sync (when the document changes) would be even better. Provide version awareness (last synced timestamp, change summary) and granular controls (which sections to index, max update frequency, access scopes). Key benefits: Always-current knowledge for task-specific agents without manual file maintenance. Better reliability for workflows that depend on evolving documents (policies, specs, project notes, SOPs). Reduced operational overhead and fewer errors from out-of-date sources. Representative use cases: Project documentation and SOPs that change frequently and must drive accurate, up-to-date agent responses. Research notes and knowledge bases in Google Docs that need to remain synchronized for ongoing analysis. Team environments where multiple collaborators update shared documents, and agents should reflect those updates immediately or on a schedule. Security and implementation considerations: Use OAuth-scoped access (read-only) with clear consent and revocation. Allow per-document permissions and explicit linking rather than broad-drive indexing. Provide admin controls and audit logs for enterprise/teams. Thank you for considering this enhancement. It would significantly increase the utility of You.com Agents for dynamic, collaborative workflows. I’m happy to share more details or participate in user testing. Best regards, Jordi Riera

I am the creator of The Imagine project, it's kinda non-profit and kinda is =1$.day/capita(global.lifetime); If you could look at theimagineproject.one and share your thoughts on it and maybe help promoting (we need 51% of humanity to make it reality (work).

Hey, congrats. I want to help out with using You.com to get better and efficient for Yoruba language translation and communication. I could also help spread it to faculties here in Nigeria and to teachers who teach the language in primary and secondary schools. Is this something we can do? Let me know what you think. You can reach me via my email. Thank you.

Hello will you.com get the latest Dolphin AI , BING's AI and Arya AI. Microsoft have been doing some incredible updates with their search engine and their AI, so it would be nice to see it on here. Cheers

Currently, I can only export individual prompt responses as Markdown, DOCX, RTF, or plain text, or copy them in Markdown format. However, a single chat thread may contain numerous interactive prompt/responses. I would like the ability to export an entire chat thread, including all prompt/responses, at once in formats such as PDF or Markdown.

It would be great to add API Support for Pro plan to use it in company internal chatbots for example throught n8n and other solutions.

I have a Team account with you.com , and while I find it superior in many ways to Gemini Pro and Perplexity for research, it has a significant commercial flaw: ARI. Under the Team, which I had hoped to extend to other analysts in my team, IO get 5 ARI generations in a month. However... when these generations return clearly incorrect data, and I request a search to fix that information, a second ARI credit is used, even when the requirement is relatively minor. A case in point is a research study into ICT project costs, where the staff size of the companies examined was found to be ridiculous. For example, an organisation with tens of thousands of staff was listed as having just 5 staff. Requesting the staff sizes of the listed organisations to be re-researched incurs a full ARI credit. The result is that in practical terms, you.com is not a viable research service: at best it can start a search, but I end up needing to move flawed reports to other services. While it is possible to move reports into other streams of prompts, that provides no research productivity compared to keeping everything inside Gemini or using other AI workflows. I wanted to provide this feedback so that you can reconsider the way the ARI workflow is deployed. A simple fix would be to automatically switch from ARI to a general prompt once a report has been completed. A more effective solution would be to address the ridiculously low monthly research threshold. I'd be happy to pay a higher price, or a per-research call, but not with the current workflow.