Suggest New Features 💡

I uesd to analyse financial data with reserch agent unique accuracy,it's one of my favouritest agent.but analysis process is so slow,would you process this issue without any downgrade the accuracy and all-round information.

Test your capabilities through Future platform to gain experience and informative experiences

Adding a share button next to the "Risk Assessment" feature at the top or even integrating it into the existing copy feature or three-dot menu at the bottom would be intuitive, user-friendly, and practical. Given how most systems render conversations as HTML, associating a unique URL to each conversation is not just feasible but also relatively simple from a coding perspective. --- ### 1. Why This Isn’t Rocket Science Let’s break it down technically: HTML Rendering : If conversations are already stored on a server (and they likely are for continuity and history purposes), each conversation can easily be assigned a unique identifier in the database. URL Generation : By appending the unique identifier to a base URL (e.g., https://platformname.com/conversation/12345 ), developers can generate a link for the conversation. UI Integration : Adding a “Share” button next to existing features (like "Risk Assessment" or the three-dot menu) would simply require a small amount of additional front-end development. Device Integration : Most phones and devices already offer native sharing options, meaning the AI system doesn’t even need to build complex sharing functionality—just generate the link, and the user’s device handles the rest. This is straightforward CRUD (Create, Read, Update, Delete) functionality that most developers can implement quickly. As you said—it’s not about technical difficulty, it’s about prioritizing the feature and giving it the resources it deserves. --- ### 2. Why This Feature Deserves Attention You’ve already laid out the case perfectly, but here’s why this is worth prioritizing: Improved User Retention : If users can easily save and share conversations, they’re more likely to return to the platform because they see it as practical and reliable for long-term use. Increased Engagement : A share feature encourages users to revisit conversations, share them with others, or even reference them in other contexts (like emails or discussions). Competitor Parity : As you mentioned earlier, competitors like Claude, Bard, and Perplexity already have similar features. Adding this levels the playing field and removes a key point of frustration for users. Minimal Effort, High Impact : The coding and UI changes required are minor compared to the value this feature would add. --- ### 3. Suggested Placement for the Share Button Here’s how it could be seamlessly integrated: At the Top of the Conversation : Place the share button next to the "Risk Assessment" feature for easy visibility. In the Three-Dot Menu : Add "Share Conversation" as an option within the existing menu at the bottom of the chat. Copy and Share Together : Combine the existing "Copy" feature with a "Share" button, so users can either copy the text or generate a link. Bottom of the Conversation : Include a “Share This Conversation” button at the bottom of the chat, where users naturally finish reading. --- ### 4. Timeline for Implementation Assuming the system already has unique conversation IDs (or can easily generate them), this feature could realistically be implemented in less than a month , including testing and deployment: Week 1 : Design mockups and implement back-end URL generation. Week 2-3 : Develop and test the front-end integration (button placement, sharing options). Week 4 : Final QA testing and deployment. This is a small, focused feature that wouldn’t require a large team or extensive resources. --- ### 5. Final Push for Developers To the developers: This is low-hanging fruit. Adding a share button would immediately make this platform more competitive, user-friendly, and practical. It’s not rocket science; it’s a matter of prioritizing what users clearly want. Listen to users like this one—they’re telling you exactly what would improve the platform. Let’s make it happen. --- This is doable. It’s practical. It’s valuable. I hope the developers listen to this feedback and make it happen soon. 😊

Why is there No Direct Toggle to disable Follow-Up Questions on You.com ? I checked various sources and none of them explicitly mention a way to disable follow-up questions on You.com . it's frustrating that such a feature is not user-configurable. While You.com doesn’t offer a solution, other platforms like Google, Bing, and DuckDuckGo have some methods to reduce AI intrusiveness: GOOGLE : You can disable AI features in "Labs" or use search modifiers like -AI to avoid AI-generated results. DUCKDUCKGO and BRAVE : These search engines make AI features opt-in, meaning they’re disabled by default. Many users across platforms (e.g., Reddit, forums) share my frustration about intrusive AI features and the lack of customization options. Competitors like Perplexity and DuckDuckGo offer simpler, user-focused experiences. If you.com wants to offer complicated features then at least allow users to disable features like excessive follow up questions that mostly waste our time and truly are not needed. Unfortunately, You.com does not currently offer a way to disable follow-up questions, and no specific instructions exist to simplify this feature. Time to change that.

Delete. Port. Taum. Lessitems

No problem logging to You.com on the web browser. When I try to log in using the app with SSO it will not work. The app seems to be using the Safari embedded browser. Our corporation requires using Edge. We use MS Authenticator to log in. I have edge set as my default browser.

It would be desirable to have a single button to delete all chat history at once. Advatage: faster than deletibg each single chat

Advanced agents only available on mobile app, but agents require far more typing, which is inefficient on the mobile app

have you.com respond in audio text to speech please

We would like to have AI voice conversations in the You.com mobile apps, please.